The process of automation testing has made headway across IT sector where a number of industries or companies are using this kind of testing in their software related tasks. It has changed the working of software development. Many testing teams are exploring how to automate the vast majority of their tests to make sure that the repeatable tests are executed whilst giving employees the quality assurance time for completing the other major tasks. So, there is no doubt that automation testing is a new concept in the software testing industry that has many benefits. But what about manual testing? Is it still required?
Yes, manual testing is still necessary despite automation testing has made testing tasks better and easier. There are a variety of tasks where manual testing must be used. Below are some of these:
Yes, manual testing is still necessary despite automation testing has made testing tasks better and easier. There are a variety of tasks where manual testing must be used. Below are some of these:
- Free for Changes and Analysis: With an automation setup, scripts are coded to ensure that the software meets all set of conditions. However, such cases need to be reviewed so that these are updated constanlty on the most current requirements. This leaves little wiggle room to complete the adjustments on the quick basis. Now the actual work of manual testing begins when QA teams get enabled to act on instinct & work on the elements on the immediate basis. Users can simply refer to the codes. They can include an element experimentaly. For this of course, testing done manually will not only less costly but also provide quicker feedback than test automation.
- New Areas of Exploration: As the current time is to use smart-phones that are getting huge popular nowadays, the problem with different applications in these technologies are common. It becomes difficult to establish automated tests that can work from the beginning due to the fact that mobile hardware is being touted as a potential boon for workplace communication and productivity as well. On the other hand, manual testing can reveal how to best approach testing on this hardware. And certainly, it will cost less in the long run than automating processes.
- Program Usability: The automation testing can only generate thousands of shadow users quickly to gauge the program's ability for managing the traffic. However, manual testing is needed for performing other aspects of a program's usability. The manual testers can actually view things from an employee's perspective.
Whilst more organizations whether small, mid or large sized are pursuing agile environments, this really doesn't mean that they are completely abandoning familiar processes. Manual testing may not be an optimal option for all the cases, however, there are some instances when things are to be done manually for maintaining the quality of the program. This is the time when manual testing is still required in-spite of using automation testing for different tasks.
